The Mariners' Museum - Monitor: History and Legacy
The Mariners' Museum Defending the Seas

Sponsored by:
Bell Atlantic Logo

Monitor - History and Legacy
" width="60" height="20" align="absbottom" border="0" name="btn" value="Search">

Selected Bibliography

The sources listed below are to provide researchers with an abbreviated bibliography of some of the more important resources on the Monitor.

Allard, Dean C. "Naval Technology During the American Civil War." American Neptune, Vol. 49, No. 2 (Spring 1989): 114-22.

Booda, Larry L. and Michael Mulcahy. "USS Monitor Expedition Retrieves Artifacts." Sea Technology, Vol. XX, No. 10 (Oct. 1979): 22-23, 25, 48-49.

Booda's "wrap-up report" sketches the activities of the two authors in the Sea-Link II, and while on board the Johnson also Sea Diver on scene "from 1-27 August expedition length 1979". Illustrations of the expedition, and a time line from 1861 to 1979 highlight this piece. The activities of NOAA, HBF, and NC Div. of Archives and History are explained and there is discussion of the possibility of raising the wreck. Also included is a list of artifacts retrieved and explanations by E. Peterkin and W.F. Searle on the equipment and techniques used in these kind of dives.

Broadwater, John D. "A Search for the USS Monitor." The International Journal of Nautical Archaeology and Underwater Exploration, Vol. 4, No. 1 (March and Sept. 1974): 117-21.

Broadwater gives an overview of the methodical search for the Monitor by Underwater Archaeological Associates, Inc., in the spring of 1973. The unsuccessful search area was northeast of Cape Hatteras Lighthouse.

Cheesebox [MNMS Activities Report]. (NOAA, 1982-present).

Published first at the East Carolina University, University of South Carolina and later at The Mariners' Museum, this occasional periodical has been issued eight times since its inception and discusses all aspects of research related to the Monitor. The run is as follows: Vol. I, No. 1 (Dec. 1982); Vol. II, No. 1 (June, 1983); Vol, II, No. 2 (April 1984); Vol. III, No. 1 (June 1984); Vol. IV, No. 1 (May 1985); Vol. V, No. 1 (Feb. 1987); Vol. VI, No. 1 (July 1993); and Vol. VII, No. 1 (Sept. 1995). The editors have included W.N. Still, G.P. Watts, Dina Hill, and Octavia Cubbins.

Coit, John. "The Quest For The Monitor." News & Observer, [Raleigh, NC] (Sept. 2, 1973).

An important piece of reporting that describes the feeling on board the Eastwind after the Monitor has been discovered but before official confirmation. The article also outlines the contributions of organizations and individuals such as John Newton, G.P. Watts, Harold Edgerton, Fred Kelly, Robert Sheridan, National Geographic Society, U.S. Army Reserve, and Duke University.

deKay, James Tertius. Monitor: The Story of the Revolutionary Ship and the Man Whose Invention Changed the Course of History. (New York: Walker and Company, in press): 224 pp.

The author skillful blends the story of the battle of Hampton Roads, the technological impact of the Monitor, and the life of her inventor, John Ericsson. The advance notice claims the volume will have "20 photographs, maps, and drawings."

Dumbell, Jimmy. "The Search for the Monitor." Charlotte Observer, (Oct. 9, 1977).

This is an insightful article on John Newton and his decision to leave Duke University to dedicate his life to Monitor research and recovery.

Ebert, Bruce C. "Questions Mine Monitor Salvage Plans." Times-Herald, [Newport News, VA] (Aug. 8, 1979).

The highlights of the issue discusses role of the Virginia's Merrimack-Monitor Commission. The commission is comprised of state legislators. The issues include costs, conflict with the state of North Carolina, and stewardship. Some of the delegates are quoted. John Newton of the MRRF appears to have been present.

Edgerton, Harold E. "The Monitor Found!" Technology Review, Vol. 77, No. 4 (Feb. 1975): 8-9, 67-68.

Edgerton's illustrated article is an overview of the 1973 and 1974 expeditions. The MIT professor outlines the role played of National Geographical Society, Duke University, G.P. Watts, John Newton, Robert Sheridan, and Edgerton and his cameras.

"The Engagement on James River." New York Herald, (May 27, 1862).

This is a lengthy article on the expedition up the James River with the Monitor, Nagatuck, Galena, Wachusett, Aroostook and Port Royal under Rodgers. The Galena had engine troubles, ran aground, and was damaged by the batteries at Drury's Bluff (Fort Darling). Members of the Wachusett were captured and the expedition was repulsed.

"The Ericsson Iron-Clad Gunboat Monitor, Brief Description of her Capacity – Her Behavior on the Ocean and in Battle." New York Herald, (March 11, 1862).

This article is a very early account of the troubles the Monitor encountered when being towed by the Seth Low from New York to Hampton Roads. It also has a detailed description of the ironclad, her dimensions, and a list of her officers. Finally, there is a copy of John Ericsson's letter to G.V. Fox explaining the choice of the name Monitor and use of the well-known phrase "Yankee notion."

Ericsson, John. "The Building of the Monitor." B&L, Vol. I, 730-44.

Ericsson gives his own views on the development of the ironclad, the impact on the health of the crew, how the review board selected the Monitor, and a tour of the ship. He answers seven of the most frequently asked questions. His remarks are very telling, such as his praise of Issac Newton, and his criticism of Bankhead and Greene. The illustrations are excellent and show Ericsson's and other inventors early concepts of the ironclad.

In this article the Swedish-American attempts to refute any influence by T.R. Timby and makes reference to Abraham Bloodgood and Gillespie's turret as mentioned in the Naval [not Nautical] Chronicle (1805).

Ericsson, John. "The Iron-Clads." Army and Navy Journal, Vol. I, No. 47 (July 16, 1864):

John Ericsson defends the cost of the ironclad vessels and makes references to imitation of the ships by European nations.

Ericsson, John. "The Monitor Iron-clads." Army and Navy Journal, Vol. I, No. 48 (July 23, 1864): 788.

Ericsson attempts to correct some misconceptions concerning the Monitor and other ironclads. Among the issues addressed are European ironclads, the defense of the United States against these ships, ordnance, armor, draft, and speed.

Garrison, Ervan G. "Three Ironclad Warships – The Archaeology of Industrial Process and Historical Myth." Historical Archaeology, Vol. 29, No. 4 (1995): 26-38.

The Monitor is one of the featured ironclads in this important article. Garrison, of the University of Georgia, describes how ironclads "were as much products of industrial process as the historic persons who conceived them" and how the "Monitor is rightly termed a true innovation in warship design."

This article includes references and images.

Glass, Jon. "Monitor Relics Bill Advances in Congress." Virginian-Pilot, [Norfolk] (Aug. 2, 1988).

Representative Walter B. Jones of North Carolina's First District introduced a bill that would allow for artifacts to be displayed on the Outer Banks. Jones was angered when he learned NOAA had leaked the selection of The Mariners' Museum as the "principle museum" without his knowledge. The bill would formalize an unofficial agreement arranged with former the NOAA director, Anthony Callo. Jones and Dale Burrus, of the Hatteras Village Civic Association are quoted. This bill became part of the re-authorization of the Marine Sanctuaries Act. This piece of legislation fueled the creation of the Graveyard of the Atlantic Museum at Hatteras Village.

"Glomar Explorer May Try to Salvage." Durham Sun, [NC] (March 4, 1976).

An announcement that John Newton of the MRRF has entered into talks with representatives of the Global Marine Development in Newport Beach, CA. Global Marine operates the federally-owned Glomar Explorer, a recovery vessel capable of picking up the Monitor.

"The Great Naval Revolution." Cornhill Magazine, Vol. V (May 1862): 550-59.

This is a call for "iron-cased vessels" for the Royal Navy by a British author after the action in Hampton Roads. The illustrations include the "Admiralty Cupola Ship," and the Monitor. Also discussed are sea-going monitors, the modifications to HMS Royal Sovereign and contributions of C.P. Coles.

Greene, Samuel Dana. "I Fired the First Guns and Thus Commenced the Great Battle." American Heritage, Vol. 8, No. 4 (June 1957): 10-13, 102-105.

This a reprint of a historic letter written by the executive officer of the Monitor on March 14, 1862 to his mother. He describes perilous voyage with the Seth Low, how the ironclad protected the Minnesota, gives details of the battle, the burning of the Congress, and damage to the ship. He also mentions many of notables such as Fox, Keeler, Worden Acting Master Louis Napoleon Stodder, and his old roommate on the Virginia, Walter R. Butt[s].

The introduction to this article notes the letter in possession of the Greene family, and reprinted by permission of George D. Greene, the naval officers son.

Hawthorne, Nathaniel. "Chiefly About War Matters, By A Peaceable Man." Atlantic Monthly, Vol. X, No. 57 (July 1862): 43-61.

A excellent travel essay by one of America's greatest authors. While touring the Virginia Peninsula Hawthorne inspected the Monitor and offered his comments about what this machine symbolized for the future. It appears this essay inspired Herman Melville to pen poems about the battle of Hampton Roads and the Monitor. The section on the Monitor (pp 57-59) is, sadly, all too brief.

Please note that Hawthorne is listed as the author in the table of contents but not at the beginning of the article.

Hess, Earl J. "Northern Response to the Ironclad: A Prospect for the Study of Military Technology." Civil War Journal, Vol. 31, No. 2 (June 1985): 126-43.

Hess's "essay is an attempt to outline a method of approaching reaction by society to war tools." The author notes "because of its spectacular battle with the Virginia in Hampton Roads, the Monitor became the war's most famous ironclad" and he also discusses the overreaction of many Northerners, believing that monitors were super weapons. This footnoted article is an important contribution to the understanding of the Monitor as a national symbol.

"Important From Fortress Monroe: The Details." New York Herald, (March 10, 1862).

One of several telling accounts that appeared in this paper, it reports on the success of the Virginia and her two "ironclad" escorts. Also, because the Virginia was not able to close on the Minnesota, the reporter assumed the attacker had also run aground. The article closes with the Monitor on the way.

"The Iron-Clads Vessels." Harper's New Monthly Magazine, Vol. XXV, No. 148 (Sept. 1862): 433-46.

A wonderful contemporary piece with engravings of the launching of the Monitor, its illustrations include the Atlantic with novelty works, production of plates, turret construction, and steam hammers. Other ironclads mentioned are the Galena and the Ironsides, and "mail-clad" Roanoke, Stevens Battery. Important facets of Monitor history include the Continental Works, J.F. Rowland, the "Franklin Forge", John Ericsson's actually involvement with construction, a discussion launching techniques, making blooms by Franklin Forge of Tugnot, Dally & Co., Egbert P. Watson, and the Novelty Works.

Keeler, William Frederick, ed. by Robert W. Daly. Aboard the USS Monitor: 1862; the Letters of Acting Paymaster William Frederick Keeler, U.S. Navy, to his Wife, Anna. (Annapolis, MD: U.S. Naval Institute Press, 1964): xvii, 278 pp.

One of the cornerstone sources of Monitor for research. The paymaster describes much of the day-to-day life on the vessel. This edition includes portraits, illustrations, and maps. Anna Elizabeth Dutton Keeler died in 1900.

"The Last Seen of the Monitor." New York Herald, (Jan. 6, 1863).

The State of Georgia brought news of the loss of the Monitor to Fort Monroe. From the fort news was telegraphed to Washington, D.C. This very lengthy article recounts the efforts of the crew of the Rhode Island to save the ironclad, the reaction of the public, the gale, the cause of the sinking ("protective armor is undoubtedly the cause of the leak"), and other related details.

Levy, Leo O. "Hawthorne, Melville, and the Monitor." American Literature, Vol. 37, No. 1 (March 1965): 33-40.

This a telling article that explains how Nathaniel Hawthorne's article in the Atlantic Monthly (July 1862) [see, # ] influenced Herman Melville's poems on the Monitor in Battle-Pieces and Aspects of the War (1866) [see, # ]. The author makes his point, however, the article does have a flaw. Levy claims Hawthorne's article appears anonymously but the "specific phraseology, imagery, and sometimes the dramatic structure" would tell Melville it was Hawthorne's essay. A check of the magazines table of contents clearly states that Hawthorne is the "Peaceable Man" in question. Consequently, Levy's discussion on the essayist's style is mute.

"Marine Says he Touched Craft." News & Observer, [Raleigh, NC] (July 18, 1955).

The news-breaking claim by Marine Cpl. Robert F. Marx that he had touched the Monitor buried upright in the sand not far form the shore. Marx is quoted. His claim later proved to be unfounded.

Meekins, Roger. "Hunt for Monitor Continues Off Hatteras." News & Observer, [NC] (May 14, 1954).

This is a usual piece for many reasons. It documents the efforts of R. T. McMullen and Col. Egglund of Vermont to locate the Monitor with the assistance form Ben Dixon MacNeill. Dixon is quoted as saying he transferred his rights to the ironclad to the National Park Service. There is also a great deal of expressed concern by North Carolinians that the artifact should remain in the Old North State when she is recovered.

Meekins, Roger. "Plan to Raise Monitor is Revived." News & Observer, [Raleigh, NC] (May 14, 1954).

A mixed crew, including R.T. McMullen, a retired postal employee; a retired U.S. Army officer; divers; photographers from Life magazine; a local airplane pilot, and a boat skipper, claimed to have located the Monitor following the leads of local historian and retired journalist Ben Dixon MacNeill. According to MacNeill, he and Joe Roberts, a photographer, located the wreck fifteen years ago about 1,000 yards from shore in about thirty feet of water and in the shadow of Cape Hatteras Lighthouse. After locating the wreck, MacNeill evidently claimed title to the remains and even refused offers to sell the ironclad.

First Previous Next Last

Go to Main Category:
Bibliography

Go to other documents in this category:



[ Navigation Bar ]

Copyright © 1999 The Mariners' Museum. All Rights Reserved.